[2017] FWC 5589
FAIR WORK COMMISSION
STATEMENT
Fair Work Act 2009
s.156 - 4 yearly review of modern awards
4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain
language re-drafting – General Retail Industry Award 2010
(AM2016/15, AM2014/270)
JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT |
SYDNEY, 27 OCTOBER 2017 |
4 yearly review of modern awards – plain language re-drafting – General Retail Industry Award 2010.
[1] A conference was held on 26 October 2017 to discuss the plain language re-drafting of the General Retail Industry Award 2010. 1 A copy of the agenda is attached at Attachment A. A transcript of the conference is available on the Commission’s website. The following parties were in attendance at the conference:
[2] The report below summarises the status of the matters discussed at the conference.
Item 8 – Clause 4 coverage 2[3] Parties agreed to substitute clause 4.2(b) for the following:
(b) apprentices or trainees employed by
a group training employer and hosted by an employer covered by this award
to perform work in the general retail industry (with a classification defined
in Schedule A—Classification Definitions)
at a workplace location
where employees mentioned in clause 4.1(b) also perform work and the group
training employers of those apprentices or trainees.
[4] The reference to 15.10(b) will be changed to 15.10(a). Items 15 and 16 not pressed.
Items 19 – 32, and 65 – Part-time employment 4[5] The following changes to clause 10 of the PLED were agreed:
10.8 For
each hour
any time worked in excess of the number of ordinary hours agreed under clauses
10.5 or 10.6, the part-time employee must be paid at the overtime rate specified
in Table 9—Overtime rates. 7
‘The minimum daily engagement for a part-time employee is 3 consecutive hours’. 8
‘The employer and the employee may agree in writing to vary the regular pattern of work agreed under clause 10.5 with effect from a future date or time’. 9
[SDA reserves its position in respect of this issued].
[Parties reserve their position and will comment on the amended draft].
[6] Item 33 resolved with the addition of the ‘provisional note’ in the PLED. Item 34 provisionally resolved, SDA to confirm.
Items 40 – 55, and 72 – ordinary hours of work 14[7] Item 40 deals with consistency of language and the use of span of hours and hours being continuous. This issue will be revisited at the next conference and the drafter will be asked to examine the issue and make a recommendation.
[8] The following changes are agreed:
(c) Except as provided by paragraph (d),
The employer must not roster an employee to work ordinary hours on more than 5 days
per week, except as provided by paragraph (d). 19
(a) Unless otherwise agreed between the employer
and the employee, The employer must roster an employee who regularly works Sundays
in such a way that they have 3 consecutive days off (including Saturday and Sunday)
per 4 week cycle, unless otherwise agreed between the employer and the employee. 20
(a) The employer must ensure that the work roster is available to all employees, either exhibited on a notice board which is conveniently located at or near the workplace or through accessible electronic means. 21
‘If the employee disagrees with the change, the period of written notice of the change required to be given is extended to at least 14 days in total’. 22
[9] Item 56 concerns Table 2 in clause 16.
[10] Revised Table 2 set out as Attachment A to the summary of submissions document dated 18 October 2017 is to replace the current table 2, with the addition of the words ‘a paid rest’ before ‘break’ in Note 1. 23
Item 57 – minimum rates (inclusion of notes) 24[11] Item 57 remains contested and will be determined by the Full Bench on the papers.
Item 62—moving expenses (definition of ‘township’) 25[12] An information note was circulated on the meaning of ‘township’ (see Attachment B). The parties are to give further consideration to a definition of ‘township’ in clause 20.5. Submissions are to be made by 4.00pm Thursday, 2 November 2017.
Item 63 – overtime and s.62 of the Act 26[13] A document on ‘reasonable overtime’ was circulated (see Attachment C). As the interaction of s.62 of the NES and reasonable overtime provisions arise in a number of modern awards a Statement will be issued to provide all interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the issue.
Item 67 – overtime 27[14] This matter remains outstanding. ABI is to provide a redraft of clause 28.1 and other parties will have an opportunity to comment.
Item 69 – shiftwork application 28[15] Remains outstanding. Full Bench to determine on the papers.
[16] Clause 25.1: The SDA contend that the clause should be redrafted to make it clear that casuals have an entitlement to overtime. SDA to file further submissions setting out the specific change sought. 29
[17] Items 44 and 45: These concern clauses 15.6(g)(v) and 15.7(a) and the provision which permits the working of an average of 38 hours per week ‘over a longer period agreed between the employer and employee’. SDA contends that the current award is limited to averaging over a 4 week period and hence clause 15.6(g)(v) is a substantial change. The drafter is asked to identify the comparable provision in the current award which was the source of clause 15.6(g)(v). 30
[18] The table below summarises the status
of the items following the conference:
Items |
Status |
Items 8, 11, 15, 16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 58 |
Resolved at conference (Items 44 and 45 partially resolved). Changes agreed to will be incorporated and the Plain Language Exposure Draft will be re-published for parties to review and comment. |
Item 57, 69 |
Full Bench to determine with regard to submissions put. |
Items 24, 26, 30, 34, 44, 45, 49, 62, 63, 67 |
Parties to confirm their position and make further submissions. |
Item 30 |
Commission to undertake research into the history of current award clause 12.8. |
Item 40 |
Plain language drafter to provide comments about how the issue may be resolved (see PN [151] – [158]). |
Items 44 and 45 |
The drafter is asked to identify the comparable provision in the current award to clause 15.6(g)(v) in the PLED. |
Items 49, 63, 65 and 72 |
Remain outstanding. |
[19] Parties are to confirm their position in respect of Items 24, 26, 30, 34, 44, 45, 49, 62, 63 and 67 and make any further submissions by 4.00pm Wednesday, 8 November 2017.
[20] A revised summary of submissions and plain language exposure draft incorporating changes arising from the resolved items will be published shortly. Interested parties will be given an opportunity to comment.
[21] All submissions are to be sent to [email protected].
PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, PR597170>
1. Item 8—Re: coverage;
2. Items 11, 15 and 16—Re: facilitative provisions;
3. Items 19 – 32, and 65—Re: part-time employment;
4. Items 33 – 34—RE: Casual employment;
5. Items 40 – 55, and 72—Re: ordinary hours of work;
6. Item 56—Re: breaks;
7. Item 57—Re: minimum rates (inclusion of notes);
8. Item 62—moving expenses (definition of ‘township’);
9. Item 63—Re: overtime and s.62 of the Act;
10. Item 67—Re: overtime; and
11. Item 69—Re: shiftwork application.
Information note—meaning of township
This information note provides information in relation to clause 20.5 – Transfer of employee reimbursement in the General Retail Industry Award 2010.
Issue: the term ‘township’ is not precisely defined and may require a more defined expression to clarify the effect of the provision.
Other modern awards that contain ‘township’
Other than the Retail Award, the Fast Food Award (clause 19.5), Hair and Beauty Award (clause 21.6) and the Pharmacy Industry Award (clause 19.6) are the only other awards which contain the term ‘township’, and all replicate the same provision:
Transfer of employee reimbursement
Where any employer transfers an employee from one township to another, the employer will be responsible for and will pay the whole of the moving expenses, including fares and transport charges, for the employee and their family.
Other modern awards with relocation allowance clauses
23 modern awards provide for relocation allowances. Terms used include ‘locality’, 31 ‘location’,32 ‘area’,33 ‘state/territory’,34 ‘town’35 and ‘city’.36 These terms may also present interpretation difficulties, as none of those terms are defined in any modern awards. Aviation awards37 contain the term ‘base’ or ‘home base’, which are defined in the definition clauses of the respective awards.
Qualifying requirements
All relocation allowance clauses contain requirements for eligibility that assist to ascertain the scope and effect of the provisions. There are a number of requirements that are common across the awards:
Reasonable overtime
Issue: The plain language version of the General Retail Industry Award 2010 (General Retail Award) removes clause 29.1 which sets out factors to be taken into account in determining whether or not overtime may be considered unreasonable. Parties have raised this issue as a substantive change to the award.
Historical background
Clause 29.1 of the General Retail Award is most likely a result of the 2002 Working Hours Case. 38 Following this decision, some pre-reform awards relevant to the General Retail Award were updated to include a reasonable overtime clause with terms similar to those set out in clause 29.1 of the General Retail Award.39
The 2008–2009 Award Modernisation Full Bench stated that the NES and modern awards are separate sources of safety net conditions. 40 Indeed, the general approach of the AIRC was to refrain from replicating or paraphrasing the provisions of the NES in making modern awards.41 Further, as part of the 4 yearly review of modern awards, a Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission stated a preference for not including notes and references to the NES.42
Approach taken in Pharmacy
The plain language drafter identified the overlap between clause 13.1(b) of the Exposure Draft Pharmacy Industry Award 2014 (Pharmacy Exposure Draft) and the NES. Clause 13.1(b) of the Pharmacy Exposure Draft is identical to clause 29.1 of the General Retail Award. The plain language drafter pointed out that the clause could be omitted as it dealt with a matter already covered by the NES. 43 In response to submissions of the parties, the Full Bench decided to include a note in the following terms:
“NOTE: Under the National Employment Standards (see section 62 of the Act) an employee may refuse to work additional hours if they are unreasonable. Section 62 sets out factors to be taken into account in determining whether the additional hours are reasonable or unreasonable.” 44
A comparison of the provisions is provided at Attachment A. Attachment A shows that a number of factors outlined in the NES are not included the Exposure Draft. 45
A 4 yearly review of modern awards Full Bench has decided not to include summaries of the NES entitlements in modern awards. 46 The plain language Full Bench did, however, decide that a note could be included that would point the reader to section 62 of the Fair Work Act 2009.47 The Full Bench stated that the note, as drafted, does not summarise or link to the NES and could therefore be included in the Pharmacy Industry Award 2010 (Pharmacy Award).48
For consistency of approach, modern awards containing a reasonable overtime clause in the same terms as those of the Pharmacy Award and the General Retail Award should be reviewed with a view to removing those clauses. It may be considered appropriate to include a note in those awards similar to that in the plain language version of the Pharmacy Award. 49
Currently 11 modern awards contain a reasonable overtime clause in the same terms as those of the General Retail Award. See Attachment B for a list of modern award that currently contain a clause in identical terms to that of clause 29.1 General Retail Award.
Building and Construction General On-site Award 2010, cl 36.1;
Cleaning Services Award 2010, cl 28.1;
Electrical, Electronic and Communications Contracting Award 2010, cl 26.1;
Fast Food Industry Award 2010, cl 26.4;
General Retail Industry Award 2010, cl 29.1;
Graphic Arts, Printing and Publishing Award 2010, cl 33.1;
Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010, cl 31.1;
Joinery and Building Trades Award 2010, cl 30.1;
Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2010, cl 40.2;
Timber Industry Award 2010, cl 30.11.
1 See summary of submissions published on 18 October 2017.
2 Transcript at [17] – [32].
3 Transcript at [33] – [37].
4 Transcript at [38] – [39].
5 Transcript at [40] – [41].
6 Transcript at [42] – [49].
7 Transcript at [94] – [103].
8 Transcript at [50] – [60].
9 Transcript at [75] – [87].
10 Transcript at [104] – [119].
11 Transcript at [120] – [122].
12 Transcript at [123] – [131].
13 Transcript at [140] – [149].
14 Transcript at [150] – [279].
15 Transcript at [158] – [160].
16 Transcript at [161] – [163].
17 Transcript at [180] – [196].
18 Transcript at [166] – [177] and [181] – [193].
19 Transcript at [203] – [238].
20 Transcript at [246] – [256].
21 Transcript at [257] – [271].
22 Transcript at [273] – [279].
23 Transcript at [279] – [295].
24 Transcript at [310] – [318].
25 Transcript at [319] – [327].
26 Transcript at [328] – [350].
27 Transcript at [350] – [366].
28 Transcript at [366] – [368].
29 Transcript at [371] – [383].
30 Transcript at [197] – [205].
31 Manufacturing and Associated Industries and Occupations Award 2010, Business Equipment Award 2010, Contract Call Centre Award 2010, Telecommunications Services Award 2010, Cement and Lime Award 2010, Premixed Concrete Award 2010, Timber Industry Award 2010, Food, Beverage and Tobacco Manufacturing Award 2010, Architects Award 2010, Vehicle Manufacturing, Repair, Services and Retail Award 2010.
32 Rail Industry Award 2010, Business Equipment Award 2010, Contract Call Centre Award 2010, Telecommunications Services Award 2010, Fire Fighting Industry Award 2010.
33 Market and Social Research Award 2010, Commercial Sales Award 2010.
34 Business Equipment Award 2010, Contract Call Centre Award 2010, Telecommunications Services Award 2010, Journalists Published Media Award 2010, Broadcasting and Recorded Entertainment Award 2010.
35 Journalists Published Media Award 2010, Broadcasting and Recorded Entertainment Award 2010.
36 Journalists Published Media Award 2010, Broadcasting and Recorded Entertainment Award 2010.
37 Air Pilots Award 2010, Aircraft Cabin Crew Award 2010, Airline Operations—Ground Staff Award 2010.
38 Decision, Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union & Others (23 July 2002) 114 IR 390.
39 See for example - Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association - Victorian Shops Interim Award 2000 AP796250CRV cl 29.1; Retail and Wholesale Industry - Shop Employees - Australian Capital Territory - Award 2000 AP794740CRA cl 26.1.
40 Statement, Award Modernisation, [2008] AIRCFB 717 (12 September 2008) [16].
41 Statement, Award Modernisation, [2008] AIRCFB 717 (12 September 2008) [16].
42 Decision, 4 yearly review of modern awards, [2014] FWCFB 9412 (23 December 2014) [34]–[36].
43 FWC, Plain language – draft documents, published 30 November 2015, page 37.
44 Decision, 4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language project – drafting Guidelines – Pharmacy Industry Award 2010 – plain language drafting issues, [2017] FWCFB 344 (20 January 2017) [205]–[209].
45 Note: the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 55(1),(4)-(5) states that modern awards must not exclude the National Employment Standards (NES) but may contain ancillary and supplementary terms or terms that have the same effect as provisions of the National Employment Standards.
46 Decision, 4 yearly review of modern awards, [2014] FWCFB 9412 (23 December 2014)[34]–[36].
47 Decision, 4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language project – drafting Guidelines – Pharmacy Industry Award 2010 – plain language drafting issues, [2014] FWCFB 344 (20 January 2017)[207].
48 Decision, 4 yearly review of modern awards – Plain language project – drafting Guidelines – Pharmacy Industry Award 2010 – plain language drafting issues, [2014] FWCFB 344 (20 January 2017)[207].
49 See clause 20 of the Exposure draft – Pharmacy industry Award 2016.