[2013] FWC 5369 [Note: An appeal pursuant to s.604 (C2013/6468) was lodged against this decision - refer to Full Bench decision dated 3 April 2014 [[2014] FWCFB 2228] for result of appeal]
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009

Sch. 5, Item 6—Review of all modern awards (other than modern enterprise and State PS awards) after first 2 years

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation and others
(AM2012/132 and others)

Various industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SMITH

MELBOURNE, 30 SEPTEMBER 2013

Modern Awards Review 2012—matters referred to Deputy President Smith—penalty rates and public holidays.

[1] The Full Bench Modern Awards Review 2012 decisions 1 referred the aforementioned applications to me to hear and determine. The table below identifies the modern awards concerned and the clauses sought to be varied.

Modern award

Clause

Penalty/Public holidays

Applicant

Matter no.

Fast Food Industry Award 2010 [MA000003]

26.1(b) and 26.1(c)

Penalty

National Retail Association

AM2012/240

26.5

Penalty

Baking Industry Association of Queensland - Union of Employers

AM2012/179

30

Public holidays

National Retail Association

AM2012/240

Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010 [MA000005]

35

Public holidays

Hair and Beauty Industry Association

AM2012/172

Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009]

32.2(c)

Public holidays

VECCI

AM2012/211

32.2(c)

Public holidays

Australian Hotels Association

AM2012/215

Nurses Award 2010 [MA000034]

32

Public holidays

Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation

AM2012/132

32

Public holidays

ACTU

AM2012/134

[2] The applications are made under Sch. 5, Item 6 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the Transitional Act) as part of the review of all modern awards which the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) 2 is required to conduct after the first two years of all modern awards coming into effect (the 2012 Review). The relevant legislation was considered by the Full Bench and set out in that decision.

[3] The Full Bench Modern Awards Review 2012 decisions 3 detail each of the variations sought by the applicants listed in the above table. However since that time almost total agreement has been reached I will deal with each Award separately.

Application by the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (AM2012/132) and application by the Australian Council of Trade Unions and others (AM2012/134)

[4] These are applications to vary clause 32—Public Holidays of the Nurses Award 2010 [MA000034].

[5] A hearing was conducted on 15 May 2013 and the parties indicated that further discussion may produce agreement in relation to these matters.

[6] Following those discussions Mr Andrew McCarthy, Federal Industrial Officer of the Australian Nursing Federation wrote to me to advise that agreement had been reached and proposed amendments to clause 32 of the award.

[7] I will make the determination in the terms agreed.

Application by the Baking Industry Association of Queensland—Union of Employers (AM2012/179) and the National Retail Association (AM2012/240)

[8] These are applications to vary clauses 26.1(b) and (c), 26.5 and 30 of the Fast Food Industry Award 2010 [MA000003].

[9] A hearing was conducted on 15 May 2013 and the parties indicated that further discussion may produce agreement in relation to these matters.

[10] Following those discussions Ms Daniela DeMartino, National Industrial Officer of the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association (SDA) wrote providing draft orders for the variations to clauses 26.1(b) and (c) and 26.5 of the award. On 18 September 2013 the parties further agreed to changes to the award - deletion of clause 19.7(c) and deletion of the words “(except for shiftworkers)” in clause 27.1(e)

[11] Submissions were also received from Siobhain West, Policy Officer, Business SA supporting the variations contained in the draft orders submitted by the SDA.

[12] A matter which was not agreed related to the treatment of compensation for public holidays. Since this matter was before me Commissioner Hampton had an identical question in relation to the General Retail Award [MA000004] [[2013] FWC 4949]. All parties were advised of this decision. In that matter the parties agreed to particular treatment for time off in lieu for public holidays.

[13] Commissioner Hampton included the following provision:

[14] The Commissioner decided that the variation would come into operation on and from 1 August 2013. He noted that the effect of the Act is that the determination will take effect in relation to employees at the start of each employee’s first full pay period that starts on or after that date.

[15] The SDA opposed any variation as it would significantly reduce the existing safety net.

[16] I have decided that the clause inserted by Commissioner Hampton is appropriate to include in this award even against the background that it was achieved by consent. In doing so the safety net for an employee does not alter unless there is agreement to do by substituting another form of compensation. To access the alternative there must be mutual consent and employees cannot be pressured into agreeing as that would not constitute genuine consent. This is emphasised by the final sub-clause.

[17] With relevant changes, the award will be varied to reflect the position set out by Commissioner Hampton. A determination varying the award will be issued.

Application by the Hair and Beauty Industry Association (AM2012/172)

[18] This is an application to vary clause 35 of the Hair and Beauty Industry Award 2010 [MA000005]. As with the matter effecting the public holiday’s provision in the fast food industry the same outcome should apply in this area.

[19] A determination varying the award will be issued.

Application by the Victorian Employers Chamber of Commerce and Industry (AM2012/211) and the Australian Hotels Association (AM2012/215)

[20] These are applications to vary clause 32.2(c) of the Hospitality Industry (General) Award 2010 [MA000009]. These matters were dealt with by Deputy President Sams in separate proceedings 4.

Conclusion

[21] In making these determinations I am satisfied that the variations will achieve the modern awards objective and ensure that they are operating effectively, without anomalies or technical problems arising from the Part 10A award modernisation process.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Appearances:

D. DeMartino on behalf of the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees’ Association.

J. Dolan on behalf of the Australian Council of Trade Unions.

A. McCarthy on behalf of the Australian Nursing Federation.

S. Elliffe on behalf of the National Retailers Association.

G. Liggins with G. Sheargold on behalf of the Aged and Community Services Association.

O. Webb on behalf of the Australian Hotels Association.

L. Fisher with L Hepworth on behalf of the Private Hospital Industry Employers Association.

S. West on behalf of the South Australian Employers Chamber of Commerce and Industry trading as Business SA.

B. Ferguson on behalf of the Australian Industry Group.

Hearing details:

2013.

Melbourne:

May, 15.

 1   [2013] FWCFB 1635—Penalty Rates; [2013] FWCFB 2168—Public Holidays.

 2   On 1 January 2013, Fair Work Australia was renamed the Fair Work Commission (the Commission). In this decision I have referred to the Commission which incorporates reference to Fair Work Australia as it was known prior to 1 January 2013.

 3   [2013] FWCFB 1635—Penalty Rates; [2013] FWCFB 2168—Public Holidays.

 4   [2013] FWC 5736.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR539788>