1
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365—General protections
Timothy Plant
v
360 Logistics Pty Ltd
(C2020/6574)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MILLHOUSE MELBOURNE, 25 FEBRUARY 2021
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal.
[1] Mr Timothy Plant (Applicant) has made an application under s 365 of the Fair Work
Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). He alleges that he was dismissed by 360 Logistics Pty Ltd in
contravention of the general protection provisions of the Act.
[2] I have decided to dismiss the application. The reasons for this decision follow.
Context
[3] The application was received by the Commission on 26 August 2020.
[4] On 27 August 2020, the Commission telephoned the Applicant regarding the unpaid
lodgement fee. The Applicant’s mobile phone service was switched off and there was no
option to leave a voicemail message.
[5] That same day, a letter was emailed to the Applicant and his representative Ms
Belinda Solomon of Employee Dismissal Claims, advising that the Applicant must pay the
lodgement fee or file a completed application for waiver of the lodgement fee (waiver
application) within 14 days, or the application may be dismissed. A SMS text message was
also sent to the Applicant’s nominated contact number requesting that he contact the
Commission because of a problem with his application.
[6] On 28 August 2020, the Applicant emailed the Commission regarding the
circumstances of his employment’s cessation and advising that he seeks to be reinstated.
Immediately thereafter, the Commission telephoned the Applicant however his mobile phone
service was switched off, and there was no option to leave a voicemail message.
[7] On 10 September 2020, a further unsuccessful attempt was made by the Commission
to telephone the Applicant.
[8] On 11 September 2020 the Commission telephoned the Applicant’s representative. A
voicemail message was left advising that the lodgement fee had not been paid, nor had a
[2021] FWC 905
DECISION
E AUSTRALIA FairWork Commission
[2021] FWC 905
2
completed waiver application been received by the Commission and in these circumstances
the application may be dismissed. The Applicant’s representative was also advised of the
Commission’s unsuccessful attempts in contacting the Applicant, and it was requested that
she contact the Commission as soon as possible.
[9] On 14 September 2020, in the absence of payment of the lodgement fee or receipt of a
completed waiver application, the Commission attempted to contact the Applicant and his
representative as follows:
(a) at 9:22 am, by telephone to the Applicant’s representative. A voice message was
left advising that the application may be dismissed unless the lodgement fee was
paid, or a completed waiver application was received within seven days.
(b) at 9:22 am, by telephone to the Applicant. However, the Applicant’s mobile phone
service was switched off and there was no option to leave a voicemail message.
(c) at 9:36 am, by letter emailed to the Applicant and his representative advising that
the application remained incomplete and may be dismissed unless the lodgement
fee was paid, or a completed waiver application was received within seven days.
(d) at 9:39 am, by email to the Applicant requesting that he urgently contact the
Commission.
(e) at 12:04 pm, by SMS text message to the Applicant requesting that he contact the
Commission because of a problem with his application.
[10] On 25 September 2020, Mr John Bingham of Employee Dismissal Claims contacted
the Commission regarding the lodgement fee. During the call, the Mr Bingham advised that
the lodgement fee would not be paid on behalf of the Applicant.
[11] On 9 October 2020, Mr Bingham contacted the Commission regarding the application.
He was advised that the application remained incomplete.
[12] To date, neither the Applicant nor his representative have paid the lodgement fee or
filed a completed waiver application.
Legislative framework
[13] In relation to an application made pursuant to s 365 of the Act, s 367 provides:
367 Application fees
(1) The application must be accompanied by any fee prescribed by the regulations.
(2) The regulations may prescribe:
(a) a fee for making an application to the FWC under section 365; and
(b) a method for indexing the fee; and
(c) the circumstances in which all or part of the fee may be waived or
refunded.
(emphasis added)
[14] Section 587 of the Act provides that:
587 Dismissing applications
[2021] FWC 905
3
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may
dismiss an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
(2) Despite paragraphs (1) (b) and (c), the FWC must not dismiss an application under
section 365 or 773 on the ground that the application:
(a) is frivolous or vexatious; or
(b) has no reasonable prospects of success.
(3) The FWC may dismiss an application:
(a) on its own initiative; or
(b) on application.
(emphasis added)
Consideration and conclusion
[15] Despite the Commission’s attempts to progress the application, the Applicant and his
representative have failed to pay the lodgement fee or file a completed waiver application.
Accordingly, the application is incomplete.
[16] In these circumstances, I am satisfied that the Applicant has failed to comply with s
367(1). Accordingly, the application has not been made in accordance with the Act. It is
therefore dismissed pursuant to s 587(1)(a) of the Act.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
PR727135
WORK COMMISSION THE SEAL OF THE
