1
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Benjamin Aimsley
v
Barra Steel (Vic) Pty Ltd
(U2020/8875)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT MELBOURNE, 17 JULY 2020
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.
[1] On 26 June 2020, Mr Benjamin Aimsley made an application to the Fair Work
Commission for a remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009
(FW Act).
[2] Mr Aimsley advised in the Form F2 Unfair Dismissal Application (Form F2) that he
commenced employment with Barra Steel (Vic) Pty Ltd on 11 March 2020 and that his
dismissal took effect on 15 June 2020.
[3] On 29 June 2020, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Aimsley on his nominated
telephone number. A voicemail message was left explaining that he did not appear to meet the
minimum employment period and that we required payment of the filing fee or a completed
waiver form. The Commission encouraged Mr Aimsley to give us a call if he wanted to pay
the filing fee or discuss the issues with the application.
[4] On 29 June 2020, the Commission also attempted to contact Mr Aimsley’s
representative, Employee Dismissal Claims, to make payment of the filing fee and discuss the
minimum employment period for the application lodged. However, they did not answer. A
voicemail message was left asking them to give the Commission a call to make payment and
discuss the matter further.
[5] Later that day, the Commission emailed correspondence to Mr Aimsley’s nominated
email address advising Mr Aimsley that, on the basis of the information provided in the Form
F2, he had not served the minimum employment period. A copy of the correspondence was
also sent to his representative. The correspondence directed Mr Aimsley to file any
documents or evidence to support his claim that he had served the required minimum
employment period. That correspondence also warned Mr Aimsley that if he did not contact
the Commission within 14 days, the application may be dismissed without further notice. An
SMS notification was also sent to Mr Aimsley’s nominated telephone number, requesting that
he contact the Commission.
[2020] FWC 3726
DECISION
E AUSTRALIA FairWork Commission
[2020] FWC 3726
2
[6] On 13 July 2020, the Commission attempted to contact Mr Aimsley twice on his
nominated telephone number. However, Mr Aimsley could not be reached. A voicemail
message was left advising that based on what was written on the form F2 he did not appear to
meet the minimum employment period and that payment or a completed waiver form had still
not been received. A message was left requesting he call the Commission.
[7] On 13 July 2020, the Commission called Mr Aimsley’s representative to follow up on
the incomplete application but they did not answer. A voicemail message was left explaining
that the matter is at risk of being dismissed as the Mr Aimsley did not appear to meet the
minimum employment period and payment has not been made. The Commission encouraged
them to call the Commission to make payment, discontinue the application or discuss the
matter further.
[8] To date, Mr Aimsley nor his representative has not replied to the Commission’s
correspondence.
[9] Section 382 of the FW Act provides that a person is protected from unfair dismissal if
they have completed a period of employment of at least the minimum employment period.
[10] Section 383 of the FW Act sets out the minimum employment period as follows:
383 Meaning of minimum employment period
The minimum employment period is:
(a) if the employer is not a small business employer—6 months ending at the
earlier of the following times:
(i) the time when the person is given notice of the dismissal;
(ii) immediately before the dismissal; or
(b) if the employer is a small business employer—one year ending at that time.
[11] Section 587(1) of the FW Act provides that:
587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss
an application if:
(a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
(b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
(c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.
[2020] FWC 3726
3
[12] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter I am satisfied that as Mr Aimsley
has not completed the required minimum employment period under the FW Act, his
application has no reasonable prospect of success. As such, the application is dismissed under
s.587(1)(c) of the FW Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
PR721024
M LAMISSION THE SEAL OF THE
