1
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394—Unfair dismissal
Troy Brown
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13979)
Campbell Dews
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13980)
Damien Mason
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13981)
Gregory Holmes
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13982)
Jeffrey Mason
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13983)
Glynnis Sabbo
v
Clermont Coal Operations Pty Ltd T/A Clermont Open Cut
(U2014/13984)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY MELBOURNE, 30 MARCH 2015
Application for relief from unfair dismissal – orders for production.
[1] Further to my decision of 19 March 2015, the Applicants seek orders that Collinsville
Coal Operations Pty Ltd and Glencore Coal Queensland Pty Ltd produce documents in the
following category:
[2015] FWC 2215[Note: An appeal pursuant to s.604 (C2015/2341) was
lodged against this decision - refer to Full Bench decision dated 10 April
2015 [[2015] FWCFB 2460] for result of appeal.]
FURTHER DECISION
AUSTRALIA FairWork Commission
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2015FWCFB2460.htm
[2015] FWC 2215
2
All documents referring to, containing or evidencing any consideration by Collinsville
Coal Pty Ltd, Collinsville Coal Operations Pty Ltd, Glencore Queensland Pty Ltd or
Glencore Coal Queensland Pty Ltd of the reasons for maintaining the relative number
of direct versus contractor supplied operator employees at the Collinsville open cut
coal mine, in existence during the period 1 September 2014 until 30 November 2015,
being documents authored by, distributed to, or in the possession of the following
persons:
Peter Freyberg
Dave Paterson
Tony Galvin
Phil Nobes
Anna Wendtman
Leanne O’Donoghue
[2] Collinsville and Glencore objected to these orders on the grounds that the documents
would reveal the internal deliberations as to the industrial strategy or policy of the
respondents to the Collinsville notices.
[3] It submitted that there is a long standing convention against issuing orders of the type
sought by the Applicants.1
[4] The Applicants submitted that they seek documents which show “the reasons why, at
the relevant time, the number of direct employees at the Collinsville mine were not what the
company had claimed publically it would be in its earlier public statements.”2
[5] The Applicants submitted that this could have been dealt with simply by having the
Respondent call the relevant decision maker to give evidence and explain the inconsistency.3
[6] The Applicants further submitted that they have put squarely in issue the contention
that the Respondent through an associated entity has deliberately structured its operations at
the Collinsville mine in order to avoid its obligations under section 389(2) of the Fair Work
Act 2009.
[7] I accept that there is a real issue between the parties about availability of redeployment
opportunities with associated entities and the reasonableness of any redeployment to positions
filled or normally filled by contractors or employees of contractors. I am not able to conclude
at this stage of the proceeding that these documents may not be relevant to this issue in
dispute.
[8] It is not clear that disclosure of such documents would reveal internal deliberations as
to industrial strategy or policy of those required to produce the documents however they may
do so.
1 Submissions in reply at [1]
2 Submissions of the Applicants at [11]
3 Ibid at [12]
[2015] FWC 2215
3
[9] I consider that this is a matter more properly dealt with by the member hearing the
substantive application. I will therefore order that the documents be produced to the
Commission but will make no orders for inspection of the documents. Should the Applicants
wish to inspect the documents they will need to seek orders of the presiding member after the
documents have been produced.
[10] The orders provided seek documents for the period 1 September 2014 to 30 November
2015. It is likely that this is a typographical error by the Applicants. However I am not
prepared to require documents to be produced for the period after the Applicants were
terminated. I will order production of the documents for the period 1 September 2014 to 30
November 2014.
[11] The Respondents seek two weeks to produce the documents. This matter is listed for
hearing on 13 April 2015 with a directions hearing on 1 April 2015.
[12] To avoid delaying the hearing of this matter, I will order the production of the
documents to the Commission by 7 April 2015.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Price code A, PR562610
FAIR WORK COMMISSION AUSTRALIA THESEAL OF
